Research Source Log for Online Source
“Specific Page Title or Article Title” Ex: “Twilight: A negative influence on teens or just harmless fun?” | "Looking Good: The Psychology and Biology of Beauty" |
Primary Contributor to the Website (if given) (author, editor, producer, etc) Ex: POV | Charles Feng |
Title of the Entire Website (not www. ) Ex: CBC News | Journal of Young Investigators |
Publisher or Sponsoring Organization of the website (if given) Ex: CBC | Journal of Young Investigators supported by The National Science Foundation and many other organizations |
Date Page was Last Revised Ex: 10 September 2010 | December 2002 |
Date You Read It Ex: 21 January 2012 | 27 January 2012 |
<URL address> (ALL of it) |
FIVE FACTS FROM THE SOURCE (Embedded): EX: The article cites Maria Nikolajeva, a professor of at Cambridge, as saying that Bella does not "in any way promote independent thinking or personal development" in women, instead portraying a woman "meek and willing to do anything for her vampire boyfriend" (POV). |
Scientifically, symmetry proves "inherently attractive to the human eye" indicating that attraction derives from similarities between the opposing sides of the face (Charles Feng). |
In Western cultures, males generally prefer women who have facial features that "resemble an infant's" while females prefer men "who look more mature" depicting the differences between preferences among both genders (Charles Feng). |
Males prefer women who have "low waist-to-hip ratios" because generally women who have "high WHRs" are more susceptible to disease and infertility (Charles Feng). |
Both genders find individuals more attractive if they behave in a "friendly manner" than others who are "cold and distant" (Charles Feng). |
Women's perceptions of beauty fluctuate "during menstruation" along with their hormones throughout the month (Charles Feng). |
Summary of Source (Three-Four Sentences of the Who, What, Where, Why, and How in your own words. NO OPINION):
Feng illustrates the scientific side of beauty by emphasizing the psychological and biological aspects of human perception. He explains the roles that symmetry, proportions, etc. play on the visual aspect of beauty and connects them to the biological reasons why we find certain components of the face more attractive than others. Moreover, he brings in the importance of certain elements, excluding visual features, such as personality and character.
Bias: Do you detect a bias (a favoring of either side) in the author's writing?
I do not sense any bias within this article.
No, the author does not cite references in the writing, but he provides a section of suggested readings that directly relate to the perception of beauty.
Use of Source: How will you use this source in your project?
I plan to use the source to provide solid scientific information so that my project is not solely based on opinion.References: Does the author cite references in the writing? If so, do these add or take away from the credibility? Attachment: Does the author or site have anything to gain from writing this, or is it simply informative? For example, is it a cigarette business posting an article about the benefit of cigarettes, or is it a scientific community unaffiliated with the cigarette business?
The author is simply presenting the psychological and biological connections of our perception of beauty.Credibility of Source:
Author or Site: Who is the author? What training have they had? If there is no author, examine the site. What is the purpose of the site? Who funds the site?
Charles Feng, the author of "Looking Good: The Psychology and Biology of Beauty", majored in biology at Stanford University. The site itself is an undergraduate, peer-reviewed science journal that is supported by numerous credible organizations. The purpose of the site is to provide information in the form of articles on a wide variety of science topics.